I am sincerely convinced that such a concept as spiritual betrayal was invented by our beloved, unique, eternally smart women. And
, in order to somehow support them, they simply came up withcategory of infidelity. If I am to write sincerely on the topic, I will admit that my first sexual experience (since the last millennium... How many years have passed already?) was with a girl who decided to cheat on her beloved. And after "that" she admitted that she had not cheated on him spiritually. So that I would not make any approaches. I had no intention of doing so. By the way, he was a married man. My friend, of course, did not like this, so she decided to "go left". Like, here is the night, he is with his wife now, at least he knows about my sincere feelings, and how am I worse? The priests I spoke with did not surprise me with their comments on the topic. I heard in response that it is still a sin: it does not matter how he cheated - spiritually or physically. This is only a "trick" of weak-willed people - to divide infidelity into "categories". And in principle, I agree with them, despite my recent atheistic views. I read somewhere that it is women who are offended when their “halves” cheat spiritually. What kind of “halves” are these then? Agreed! A
offends accordingly, on the contrary - physicalbetrayal of loved ones. And the reasoning of psychologists about the fact that women can feel less pleasure after sex "on the side" because they will be strongly suffocated by a sense of guilt and the fact that by cheating on the father of the children, she is cheating on the latter, to put it mildly, in my opinion, is controversial. At the same time, it is believed that if there is spiritual closeness not with her husband, but with another man, a woman can eventually move on to the latter. But will he need her? And this opinion has stuck in my memory: spiritual betrayal in women more often leads to physical intimacy. Logically, if men - "primitive creatures" - cheat physically, then as a result they can also reach spiritual betrayal? Therefore, they get fantastic impressions on visits to their mistress, and in the future they can "move" to one of them? Never! In a minimum of cases! - know this, mistresses. And let him tell you that he is cozy with you, so warm spiritually, he will not be with you, despite the "spiritual closeness". It was very interesting to hear words on the topic from respected women. One admitted that she cheated on her husband spiritually because she cannot tell him everything, because if you tell him something, he will draw the wrong conclusions. And he... You can talk to him about almost everything. And, even if he is also not free, the main thing is that there is spiritual closeness. Another woman surprised me a little with her reasoning. She believes that spiritual betrayal is, for example, when she is Orthodox, he is Catholic, and in his family there is a tradition to marry only Catholics. She would "cheat" - change her confession. But my personal opinion is that when they start dividing the one God into confessions, this is already... I heard from men (who would doubt that they say this) about the benefits of betrayal - physical. Like, I go back to my wife and understand that she is still the best! And also - here I cheated on my wife, as if I fell in love with another, but where is the guarantee that I will not cheat on another? Male logic: you like a woman – and go for it! Why then in bed with her think about how you cheated on your wife? Maybe I described my thoughts a little confusingly, but, you must agree, it is indisputable: a person is a single whole physically and spiritually. And when "
" and "lyricism" in a person begin to conflict(to change in different ways), you already need to take coupons to see doctors. He changed (she changed) so he changed, and what other excuses can there be here? Alexander PUKSHANSKY. We recommend reading: