Why caesarean section is better than natural births - doctors

What is a Caesarian section is known to everyone. The method of childbirth, when a child does not appear on its own, according to the birth canal, but through a surgical incision on the uterus and the anterior abdominal wall. In general, it should be performed exclusively for medical reasons: for example, an anatomically narrow pelvis, vision problems, improper fetal position, bleeding, fetal hypoxia and so on. But mummies often practice this principle: pay and do not give birth yourself. At once we will note: at us in the country cesarean without indications it is not authorized. But personal agreement can solve any issues, which is a sin to hide.Photo:GettyImages Which childbirth is better is a controversial and painful topic. Mothers who advocate naturalness twist their fingers at their temples, looking in bewilderment at those who voluntarily agree to undergo abdominal surgery (in fact, it is caesarean - it is). They say. Oksana Samoilova, who had three cesareans, would disagree with them, but not the point. Those who do not want to give birth on their own find hundreds of arguments in their favor. First of all, they tell horror stories about friends whose children were squeezed out of their belly / dropped on the floor / pulled with forceps ... Stop. But now about the latter in more detail. Surprisingly, Western experts are of the same opinion. They insist: between forceps, vacuum or cesarean, you need to choose exactly the operation! And this is not unfounded, but according to the results of a large-scale study published in the authoritative Canadian Medical Association Journal. Scientists from Columbia University have tested more than 187,000 babies born in Canada over the past 10 years. They studied, in particular, situations when the crumbs occupied a transverse position in the abdomen, and they had to be taken out using one of three methods. “The risk of serious complications with forceps or vacuum extraction is 80 percent higher than with a caesarean section,” experts say, and this is not just about babies, but also about their mothers. Women who were "helped" to give birth with the help of eerie-looking instruments were ten times more likely to have ruptures and severe bleeding. Curiously, three years ago, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists urged doctors to do the opposite: minimum CS, better invasive methods. So they were wrong? ”“ It's important to understand that C-section, forceps, and vacuum have their own risks, ”says lead author Julia Muraka. - They occur in about every fifth case, and doctors are obliged to warn a woman about the possible consequences of using a particular method. And ideally, this should happen even before the contractions start, when the woman still has the opportunity to make a choice. Encouraging frequent use of forceps can lead to an increase in birth injuries, though Dr. Muraka says there are still cases where forceps and vacuum are needed to save a child's life. At least in situations where the counting goes on for minutes, and there is no longer time to deploy an urgent operating room for an emergency Caesarean.